Failure Analysis Services

Investigate why a material, component or product failed. Anysis combines failure history, microscopy, materials characterization and targeted analytical testing to identify evidence consistent with likely failure mechanisms.

What Is Failure Analysis?

Failure analysis is a systematic investigation used to understand why a material, component or product did not perform as expected. The objective is to move from the visible symptom—such as a fracture, corrosion, delamination, discoloration or loss of performance—to evidence about the underlying failure mechanism and contributing factors.

A strong investigation starts before laboratory testing. Service history, operating conditions, manufacturing changes, photographs, fracture location and comparison samples can be as important as the instrument data.

Questions This Service Can Help Answer

Failure Modes We Can Help Investigate

The exact workflow depends on the failed material and the evidence available. Investigations may focus on one failure mode or several interacting mechanisms.

Cracking & Fracture

Examine fracture features, initiation zones, microstructure and material condition.

  • Brittle/ductile features
  • Crack origin
  • Material defects

Corrosion & Chemical Attack

Investigate corrosion products, local chemistry and environmental contribution.

  • Pitting/deposits
  • Surface chemistry
  • Material/environment interaction

Wear & Surface Damage

Study abrasion, erosion, transfer, roughness and localized surface changes.

  • Wear morphology
  • Debris identification
  • Surface condition

Adhesion & Delamination

Examine coating, adhesive or interface failures and possible contamination.

  • Interface chemistry
  • Coating defects
  • Bond-line evidence

Residues & Foreign Material

Identify particles, residues or unexpected materials associated with the failure area.

  • Particles
  • Process residues
  • Unexpected substances

Aging & Material Degradation

Investigate thermal, chemical or environmental changes that may reduce performance.

  • Oxidation
  • Polymer degradation
  • Thermal history

Typical Failure Analysis Techniques

Methods are selected to answer specific hypotheses. The goal is not to run every available instrument, but to use the minimum set of complementary methods that can distinguish likely failure mechanisms.

Method selection is project-specific. Final technique, sample preparation and reporting scope should be confirmed before testing begins.

Optical Microscopy

Initial visual and fracture examination

SEM-EDS

High-resolution morphology + elemental analysis

FIB / Cross-Section

Localized cross-sectional investigation

FTIR / Raman

Organic residues and polymer changes

XPS / TOF-SIMS

Surface chemistry and contamination

XRD

Crystalline phases and corrosion products

DSC / TGA

Thermal history and degradation

Mechanical Testing

Property comparison and verification

ICP-MS / ICP-OES

Elemental composition and impurities

GC-MS / LC-MS

Organic contaminants or degradation products

Hardness / Nanoindentation

Localized mechanical properties

Profilometry / AFM

Surface topography and roughness

When to Start a Failure Analysis

The analytical scope should be tied to a real technical or business decision—not simply to a list of available instruments.

Field Returns

Investigate components that fail earlier than expected during service.

Manufacturing Problems

Understand defects that appear after a process, material or equipment change.

Supplier Quality

Compare failed parts with supplier references or incoming material specifications.

Recurring Defects

Identify evidence that explains repeated cracks, residues, discoloration or delamination.

Product Improvement

Use failure evidence to guide material, design or process improvements.

Good vs. Bad Comparison

Apply the same analytical plan to failed and functioning samples to isolate meaningful differences.

What You May Receive

Deliverables are structured to help identify failure mechanisms and support root-cause decisions. Findings may combine visual evidence, analytical data, comparisons and technical interpretation.

Failure Evidence

Microscopy, photographs and analytical observations documenting the location, morphology and characteristics of the failure.

Root Cause Findings

Evidence-based assessment of the mechanisms and contributing factors most consistent with the observed failure.

Supporting Analytical Data

Relevant spectra, images, elemental data, measurements or comparative results supporting the investigation.

Recommended Next Steps

Technical interpretation and suggested verification, process review or additional analysis where further investigation is appropriate.

From Your Question to Useful Results

The process begins with the decision you need to make, then defines the analytical scope, sample plan and deliverables.

Preserve & Document

Record failure condition, service history and sample orientation before destructive preparation.

Examine & Form Hypotheses

Use visual/microscopic evidence to identify likely initiation sites and possible mechanisms.

Test the Hypotheses

Apply targeted chemical, structural, thermal, surface or mechanical analysis.

Integrate the Evidence

Summarize findings, confidence level and the evidence supporting the likely failure mechanism.

Failure Analysis FAQs

Clear answers about method selection, samples, project scope and analytical expectations.

Have a Failed Component?

Send photos, service history and the sample condition before cleaning or cutting. We can help plan the investigation.

Provide service history, time to failure, photographs, drawings, operating conditions, recent process or supplier changes and any known-good comparison samples.

Usually no. Cleaning can remove residues, corrosion products or particles that are important evidence. Ask the laboratory before altering the sample.

Usually no. Cleaning can remove residues, corrosion products or particles that are important evidence. Ask the laboratory before altering the sample.

Yes. Good/bad comparison is often one of the most effective ways to isolate meaningful material, surface or composition differences.

The investigation may use microscopy, SEM-EDS, FTIR/Raman, XPS, XRD, thermal analysis, elemental analysis, mechanical testing and other targeted methods as appropriate.

Yes. Localized residues and particles can be critical evidence and may be investigated using material identification, surface analysis or impurity-analysis methods.

The failed component should be preserved as completely as practical. Additional reference, unused or known-good samples can substantially improve the investigation.

Lead time depends on complexity and whether the project proceeds in stages. Initial observations may guide additional analytical work before a final report is completed.

PROJECT INQUIRY

Tell us what you need to find out. Our engineers can help define the testing scope, sample requirements and next steps.